A FULL-STACK PRODUCTION-PLATFORM REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR GOVERNED AGENTIC AND AUTOMATED-ACTION ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22278468Keywords:
reference architecture; production platform; agentic systems; enterprise automation; industrial IoT; observability; orchestration; sagas; residency-filtered routing; conformal prediction; grounding; off-policy evaluation; drift; closed-loop learning; operational readiness; conformance profiles.Abstract
A large fraction of enterprise AI systems that work in a pilot never operate reliably in production, because a running system must do far more than score a model: it must ingest heterogeneous data, turn it into analytics-driven decisions, execute actions, observe its own behavior, keep humans in the loop at the right moments, and improve from realized outcomes - continuously, under a service-level objective. This paper specifies a full-stack production-platform reference architecture for systems that plan, decide, and act, whether the actor is a conversational or LLM agent, a robotic or enterprise-process automation, an industrial or IoT control loop, an operational decision-support service, or an integrated analytics platform. Every layer is a first-class, contract-bearing component: a data foundation and shared context, an orchestration and workflow runtime with saga compensation, a residency-filtered model gateway and router, an analytics layer progressing descriptive-to-prescriptive, an action-and-tool-execution layer with transactional effects, and a human-in-the-loop review surface - wrapped by two cross-cutting spines, governance and an analytics-and-observability spine, and served by a control plane under an operational-readiness discipline. The observability spine is specified in depth: capture-at-commit execution records, a composite and agent-native validity signal, trajectory-level risk and credit assignment, drift-under-action, decision-trace completeness and freshness as operational measures, escalation under a capacity model, and a closed learning loop that retrains from realized outcomes and is defended as an attack surface. Seven normative invariants (R1–R7) span the stack, and three cumulative conformance profiles (Observable, Governed, Adaptive) let heterogeneous platforms adopt the specification incrementally and interoperate. The architecture is complementary to a decision-production and conformance framework such as Governed Decision-Intelligence (GDI): that framework certifies how each decision is produced; this one specifies how the system that acts on it is built, observed, and operated.
References
Sigelman, B. et al. Dapper, a Large-Scale Distributed Systems Tracing Infrastructure; OpenTelemetry specification.
Garcia-Molina, H. and Salem, K. Sagas (compensating transactions for long-running work).
Lewis, P. et al. Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks.
Li, L. et al. A Contextual-Bandit Approach to Personalized Recommendation; Dudík, Langford, and Li, doubly robust policy evaluation.
Vovk, V., Gammerman, A., and Shafer, G. Algorithmic Learning in a Random World; split-conformal prediction.
Population Stability Index; Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic; Jensen–Shannon divergence; Ramdas et al., anytime-valid inference.
Manakul, P. et al. SelfCheckGPT; Es, S. et al. RAGAS; Zheng, L. et al. Judging LLM-as-a-Judge (model-graded evaluation).
Greshake, K. et al. Indirect Prompt Injection; Biggio, B. et al. Poisoning Attacks (learning-loop security).
Beyer, B. et al. Site Reliability Engineering: service-level objectives, error budgets, production-readiness review.
Sculley, D. et al. Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems.
CRISP-DM: the descriptive-to-prescriptive analytics lifecycle; analytics-capability and decision-quality model.
Governed Decision-Intelligence (GDI): a decision-production and conformance framework (companion work).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that the IPHO Journal will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
